Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Terry Freedman's avatar

Excellent article. I too enjoy the idea of an antilibrary! I don't know if this might be of interest to some of your readers, but 6 months ago I wrote about my methods for reading several books efficiently in a short time, not necessarily for enjoyment per se (in my case I had a week in which to review them): https://terryfreedman.substack.com/p/how-i-read-4-books-and-reviewed-them?utm_source=publication-search

Academic reading: My approach was to read the acknowledged expert's or experts' work but then seek out contrary views, because (a) the experts are often stuck in their views (I think Kuhn was more correct than Popper in his views of how orthodoxy gets overturned) and (b) the acknowledged experts get published and reviews by people in the same echo chamber. Not always of course, but I think that is definitely a thing.

At the moment I'm going through a Substack reading paralysis: there's so much good stuff to read here that sometimes it can be overwhelming. If you have a strategy for that, I'd love to hear it. Mine has been, so far, a bit of a cull of the ones I subscribe to

Thanks again for a great article

Gianni Simone's avatar

Thanks for this. Reading is so important and yet so overlooked by too many people.

Whenever I leave home, I triple check I have at least one book in my bag: what if I'm caught riding the train for 30 minutes or one hour and I have nothing to read? This is a truly SCARY thought.

43 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?